# Calibrating Work Surface Location With Touchplate Possible?

**URL:** <https://forum.avidcnc.com/t/calibrating-work-surface-location-with-touchplate-possible/5859>\
**Category:** General Chat\
**Created:** [March 7, 2026, 12:21am UTC](https://forum.avidcnc.com/t/calibrating-work-surface-location-with-touchplate-possible/5859 "2026-03-07T00:21:38Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 19\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Surpher23](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/cc9497/32.png) [@Surpher23](https://forum.avidcnc.com/u/Surpher23)\
**Post date:** [March 7, 2026, 12:21am UTC](https://forum.avidcnc.com/t/calibrating-work-surface-location-with-touchplate-possible/5859/1 "2026-03-07T00:21:38Z")

</div>

Is there a way to calibrate the work surface location with the touchplate instead of manually jogging down to calibrate? Maybe it’s unnecessary, but it would be more convenient after resurfacing the spoilboard. I imagine it would also be more accurate, which would help with having job z-zero set at bottom of material, like in cabinetry.

Just wondering if this is possible to do or not.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Eric](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex027/user_avatar/forum.avidcnc.com/eric/32/3220_2.png) [@Eric](https://forum.avidcnc.com/u/Eric)\
**Post date:** [March 7, 2026, 1:06am UTC](https://forum.avidcnc.com/t/calibrating-work-surface-location-with-touchplate-possible/5859/2 "2026-03-07T01:06:45Z")

</div>

It’s not possible to re-calibrate the spoilboard with the touch plate. It’s meant to be done with the tip of a bit.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![rockstarsmurf](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/b487fb/32.png) [@rockstarsmurf](https://forum.avidcnc.com/u/rockstarsmurf)\
**Post date:** [March 8, 2026, 12:43am UTC](https://forum.avidcnc.com/t/calibrating-work-surface-location-with-touchplate-possible/5859/3 "2026-03-08T00:43:36Z")

</div>

> [@Eric](#):
>
> It’s not possible to re-calibrate the spoilboard with the touch plate. It’s meant to be done with the tip of a bit.

I initially thought this was a big oversight but now wonder if it is set up to work this way:

When you use the touch plate to set the x y z origin for a job, does that new z coordinate become the bench mark that the macro calculates the new tool length from after a tool change? If so, then it makes the worksurface calibration less critical because the macro is measuring the new tool length relative to the most recently probed value for your stock setup. You still need to do it but its ok that there is the possibility of a slight inaccuracy due to eyeballing it… is that how it works?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![JeffsDesign](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex027/user_avatar/forum.avidcnc.com/jeffsdesign/32/5574_2.png) [@JeffsDesign](https://forum.avidcnc.com/u/JeffsDesign)\
**Post date:** [March 8, 2026, 1:17am UTC](https://forum.avidcnc.com/t/calibrating-work-surface-location-with-touchplate-possible/5859/4 "2026-03-08T01:17:29Z")

</div>

Once you set the work surface with the utils you’re good to go until the next time you resurface your work surface.. it’s one of the beautiful features of the EX controller

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Eric](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex027/user_avatar/forum.avidcnc.com/eric/32/3220_2.png) [@Eric](https://forum.avidcnc.com/u/Eric)\
**Post date:** [March 8, 2026, 2:13am UTC](https://forum.avidcnc.com/t/calibrating-work-surface-location-with-touchplate-possible/5859/5 "2026-03-08T02:13:56Z")

</div>

> [@rockstarsmurf](#):
>
> When you use the touch plate to set the x y z origin for a job, does that new z coordinate become the bench mark that the macro calculates the new tool length from after a tool change? If so, then it makes the worksurface calibration less critical because the macro is measuring the new tool length relative to the most recently probed value for your stock setup. You still need to do it but its ok that there is the possibility of a slight inaccuracy due to eyeballing it… is that how it works?

Tool length is calculated off of the spoilboard. It’s critical that whenever you surface your spoilboard you recalibrate it.

When you use the touch plate it sets a Z offset from the spoilboard. so if you touch off to a .725 piece of plywood with your touch plate your Z offset will be set to .725. If your spoilboard has not been recalibrated though this number will not represent the correct thickness of your material.

> [@JeffsDesign](#):
>
> Once you set the work surface with the utils you’re good to go until the next time you resurface your work surface.. it’s one of the beautiful features of the EX controller

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Eric](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex027/user_avatar/forum.avidcnc.com/eric/32/3220_2.png) [@Eric](https://forum.avidcnc.com/u/Eric)\
**Post date:** [March 8, 2026, 2:15am UTC](https://forum.avidcnc.com/t/calibrating-work-surface-location-with-touchplate-possible/5859/6 "2026-03-08T02:15:35Z")

</div>

[![](https://canada1.discourse-cdn.com/flex027/uploads/avidcnc/original/2X/4/4139589e82a966cdfc1837d82e9d5cf2af0c010a.jpeg "Choosing the Right Z Zero for your Job") ](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-dk5WDKdWBQ)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Surpher23](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/cc9497/32.png) [@Surpher23](https://forum.avidcnc.com/u/Surpher23)\
**Post date:** [March 8, 2026, 4:34am UTC](https://forum.avidcnc.com/t/calibrating-work-surface-location-with-touchplate-possible/5859/7 "2026-03-08T04:34:44Z")

</div>

I wonder if someday Avid might consider utilizing the touchplate for calibrating the spoilboard more accurately. I know I read somewhere that that decision was purposeful since some people don’t have the touch plate, but it would be nice to have that as an optional way to do it for those of us that do have the touchplate.

Sometimes it can be a little difficult to get a really accurate reading when manually jogging down, especially with certain bit geometries. I try to use the handy “wiggle the paper” method or use some thin tinfoil to get it as accurate as possible. But the touchplate would make it much easier and reliable I would think.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![rockstarsmurf](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/b487fb/32.png) [@rockstarsmurf](https://forum.avidcnc.com/u/rockstarsmurf)\
**Post date:** [March 8, 2026, 5:47am UTC](https://forum.avidcnc.com/t/calibrating-work-surface-location-with-touchplate-possible/5859/8 "2026-03-08T05:47:01Z")

</div>

An old school machinist showed me a trick one time, instead of using paper or tin foil, use a 1/4” steel dowl laid on its side, perpendicular to the tool in your spindle. Its more obvious when you make contact and it wont compress like paper and should give you a more accurate offset.

Or if you have the touch plate, you can take your measurement before you start the calibration utility, write it down on a piece of paper and then when you use the calibration utility, manually lower the z axis until the DRO matches the position you wrote down.

Either way, I agree with you, if everything else is calculated off that initial calibration then it would makes sense to make it the most accurate part of the process.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![djdelorie](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex027/user_avatar/forum.avidcnc.com/djdelorie/32/515_2.png) [@djdelorie](https://forum.avidcnc.com/u/djdelorie)\
**Post date:** [March 8, 2026, 6:04am UTC](https://forum.avidcnc.com/t/calibrating-work-surface-location-with-touchplate-possible/5859/9 "2026-03-08T06:04:15Z")

</div>

I use broken router bits for this. If you want to try it, the trick is to jog the tool a little too _low_ and roll the bit under while jogging up, so you don’t press down on the bit and break the tool.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![PaulC](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/e9a140/32.png) [@PaulC](https://forum.avidcnc.com/u/PaulC)\
**Post date:** [March 8, 2026, 1:39pm UTC](https://forum.avidcnc.com/t/calibrating-work-surface-location-with-touchplate-possible/5859/10 "2026-03-08T13:39:36Z")

</div>

Why can’t you use the touch plate to get the current “height “ of the top of the spoil board. Go to that height, and set top of spoil board from that location? Pull the tool before the move if you lack confidence in your touch plate technique 🙂 .

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Eric](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex027/user_avatar/forum.avidcnc.com/eric/32/3220_2.png) [@Eric](https://forum.avidcnc.com/u/Eric)\
**Post date:** [March 8, 2026, 1:51pm UTC](https://forum.avidcnc.com/t/calibrating-work-surface-location-with-touchplate-possible/5859/11 "2026-03-08T13:51:24Z")

</div>

> [@Surpher23](#):
>
> I wonder if someday Avid might consider utilizing the touchplate for calibrating the spoilboard more accurately. I know I read somewhere that that decision was purposeful since some people don’t have the touch plate, but it would be nice to have that as an optional way to do it for those of us that do have the touchplate.

You’ve got to remember we try to engineer solutions that work for as many people as possible. Not everyone has a touch plate, and not everyone who has a touch plate has it accurately setup, and some touch plates are broken.

The “paper trick” or “scrape the spoilboard with a bit” is actually really accurate and works for everyone that has a machine that moves, and if your machine moves you can calibrate it.

> [@rockstarsmurf](#):
>
> An old school machinist showed me a trick one time, instead of using paper or tin foil, use a 1/4” steel dowl laid on its side, perpendicular to the tool in your spindle. Its more obvious when you make contact and it wont compress like paper and should give you a more accurate offset.
> 
> Or if you have the touch plate, you can take your measurement before you start the calibration utility, write it down on a piece of paper and then when you use the calibration utility, manually lower the z axis until the DRO matches the position you wrote down.
> 
> Either way, I agree with you, if everything else is calculated off that initial calibration then it would makes sense to make it the most accurate part of the process.

This!

> [@PaulC](#):
>
> Why can’t you use the touch plate to get the current “height “ of the top of the spoil board. Go to that height, and set top of spoil board from that location? Pull the tool before the move if you lack confidence in your touch plate technique

Because as I said earlier, not everyone has a touch plate, a working touch plate or an accurate touch plate.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Surpher23](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/cc9497/32.png) [@Surpher23](https://forum.avidcnc.com/u/Surpher23)\
**Post date:** [March 9, 2026, 5:48pm UTC](https://forum.avidcnc.com/t/calibrating-work-surface-location-with-touchplate-possible/5859/12 "2026-03-09T17:48:37Z")

</div>

> [@rockstarsmurf](#):
>
> Or if you have the touch plate, you can take your measurement before you start the calibration utility, write it down on a piece of paper and then when you use the calibration utility, manually lower the z axis until the DRO matches the position you wrote down.

This is a good idea! I’ll have to try this.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![JeffsDesign](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex027/user_avatar/forum.avidcnc.com/jeffsdesign/32/5574_2.png) [@JeffsDesign](https://forum.avidcnc.com/u/JeffsDesign)\
**Post date:** [March 9, 2026, 7:55pm UTC](https://forum.avidcnc.com/t/calibrating-work-surface-location-with-touchplate-possible/5859/13 "2026-03-09T19:55:48Z")

</div>

Surpher23 after you tried this would you come back and tell us what results you have? Just curious!!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Eric](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex027/user_avatar/forum.avidcnc.com/eric/32/3220_2.png) [@Eric](https://forum.avidcnc.com/u/Eric)\
**Post date:** [March 9, 2026, 8:36pm UTC](https://forum.avidcnc.com/t/calibrating-work-surface-location-with-touchplate-possible/5859/14 "2026-03-09T20:36:02Z")

</div>

I would recommend using the procedure as it’s meant to be used. I don’t see a time savings here or an accuracy gain.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![JeffsDesign](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex027/user_avatar/forum.avidcnc.com/jeffsdesign/32/5574_2.png) [@JeffsDesign](https://forum.avidcnc.com/u/JeffsDesign)\
**Post date:** [March 9, 2026, 8:53pm UTC](https://forum.avidcnc.com/t/calibrating-work-surface-location-with-touchplate-possible/5859/15 "2026-03-09T20:53:22Z")

</div>

I agree with you I was just curious!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Heiko77](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/h/67e7ee/32.png) [@Heiko77](https://forum.avidcnc.com/u/Heiko77)\
**Post date:** [March 10, 2026, 12:08am UTC](https://forum.avidcnc.com/t/calibrating-work-surface-location-with-touchplate-possible/5859/16 "2026-03-10T00:08:41Z")

</div>

Does the accuracy of the surface calibration matter at all?

Typically I use the touch plate to set my zero before starting to work anyway. I think I never updated the surface calibration after flattening it.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Eric](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex027/user_avatar/forum.avidcnc.com/eric/32/3220_2.png) [@Eric](https://forum.avidcnc.com/u/Eric)\
**Post date:** [March 10, 2026, 11:31am UTC](https://forum.avidcnc.com/t/calibrating-work-surface-location-with-touchplate-possible/5859/17 "2026-03-10T11:31:09Z")

</div>

If you ever want to zero from the table it will be inaccurate. Additionally in the offsets table your material thickness will be wrong if you zero from the top. This means features like the spoilboard protesting feature won’t work.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Heiko77](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/h/67e7ee/32.png) [@Heiko77](https://forum.avidcnc.com/u/Heiko77)\
**Post date:** [March 10, 2026, 12:35pm UTC](https://forum.avidcnc.com/t/calibrating-work-surface-location-with-touchplate-possible/5859/18 "2026-03-10T12:35:45Z")

</div>

I always zero the table with the touchplate, never the top of my workpiece. I forgot about the spoilboard protection - but I had turned this off after day one when i drilled bench dog holes in my spoilboard 🙂

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Eric](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex027/user_avatar/forum.avidcnc.com/eric/32/3220_2.png) [@Eric](https://forum.avidcnc.com/u/Eric)\
**Post date:** [March 10, 2026, 1:46pm UTC](https://forum.avidcnc.com/t/calibrating-work-surface-location-with-touchplate-possible/5859/19 "2026-03-10T13:46:47Z")

</div>

You can do that too, but if you have your spoilboard calibrated correctly instead of doing that you can save yourself time by just going to Set Part Zeros\>WCS Table and just setting the Z offset to 0
