Personally I have. Before working at Avid I built my own ATC system on a production 4x8 machine. Centroid/Acorn rocks for ATC. Thereās a lot of documentation and built in software support for it.
On that noteā¦ Any chances Avid will release an ATC spindle? If so, would you say itāll be released in the next months, quarters, or years?
Weāll have more to say soon, but I can say a couple of things:
-This new platform sets us up to release a lot of neat stuff
-We havenāt stopped working since this launch
Hereās a good answer for you: ATC is coming! Read on for more details
This is awesome! With the coming ATC and a USB-BOB, it looks like all the work is done for my dreams of a big kid cnc console are coming true!
Now just the wait. Itās already killing me.
Do you know if it will work with other ATC spindles like cncdepotās?
Will it be a Hiteco ATC spindle, or a different brand? Curious minds want to know
I canāt see why the CNC Depot ATCs wonāt work great with the new EX controller. I have a Centroid Acorn controller, Clearpath servos and the CNC Depot RM40 āTurnkey ATC Spindle Packageā on a Pro4860 with the rotary kit and Opt lasers. It all works great together. I think youād need to investigate whether the wiring in the EX controller is similar to what they used before. That makes the spindle package plug and play, with nice pneumatics built into the VFD box.
If youāve spent any time on the Centroid Forum, youāve probably seen a lot of good things about āswissiās Probe Appā. That add-on make all kinds of things, including ATC, incredibly user friendly in the CNC12 environment
Just like our Mach controllers this new EX control uses standard wiring/communication to make the spindle do āspindle thingsā for example:
A simple relay starts and stops the spindle. 0-10 volts controls the speed of the spindle. Itās all done using our same 14 pin connector too, so if you have one of our VFDs already you can just plug it into our new controller and be off and running:
(This is the Mach controller pinout)
Our software mods for tool changes in the Centroid EX controllers will work with any spindle/router too. At the end of the day all weāre doing is starting/stopping the spindle and controlling the speed.
Our āMTCā system of manual tool height measurement will work with any spindle/router too because all weāre doing is measuring tools.
So in short, if you could use it with our old system it will work with our new system.
Weāll have more detail to share on that soon, however Iāll leave you with this quote from Ahren:
Hey Eric,
So, I built my own controller using LinuxCNC with a Mesa card and Iām using the ClearPATH servoās.
This is on a 5x10 machine with 12" Z. I did the auto-tune on the X axis, and copied the profiles to the Y1, Y2 and Z. I didnāt use the weights or anything. It looks pretty good. Maybe Iāll go back and tune stuff a bit better. I did weight everything in sections so I can add up the weight.
My question is, Why the 3432Pās vs 3432S ? Maybe the Pās are better for the Screw driven machines, but, you want the S version for rack & pinion. I can push 1000 IPM no problem. Also have HLFB enabled and when a crash happens, the machine goes into instance E-Stop. This was why WHOLE reason I got the servoās. (This machine is in a Maker Space). I ended up using the same servo for all axisās. CPM-SDSK-3432S-ELN The Z can do 400IPM no problem. Which is pretty scary.
Machine is setup with a 4HP CNC Depot spindle and a 12 station ATC.
Finishing up the spoil board right now.
I personally didnāt pick the motors, our engineers worked really closely with Teknic to make this pick and tune them. My understanding is that the Pās hold power over a much longer RPM range, and the Sās drop off pretty quickly once the RPMs get higher.
Hereās what it really means though:
Thatās a .75" diameter bit cutting at 1.25" depth, single pass with 70% stepover at 800 IPM.
These motors with our custom tuning RIP.
I looked a the torque curves. The S can do around 900 RPM @ 320 constant oz-in, the Pās can do around 1750 @ 209 oz-in. I decided for more torque vs speed. With the way I have mine tuned, I can do a full 1000 IPM and full torque. Itās pretty scary. Maybe going faster would be nice for tool change, but, thatās about it. I have NO idea why anyone would want to run any faster than that on these machines. Theyāre not rigid enough to take advantage of it. If I run a 1/2" endmill at 175 IPM, I get inconstant hole shapes due to the mass of the gantry. I slow it down they come back into shape. Just my thoughtsā¦
@Eric Oh my godā¦ looks incredible
I have been eagerly watching AVIDās support site and I saw some general instructions for the EX controller were posted but no schematics yet. Are those still forthcoming?
They are, not sure on the exact timeline however.
Iām trying to decide between keeping my setup with NEMA23 steppers and just upgrading to the new controller for the improvements over Mach4, or going all the way to a Servo setup. I donāt really have much trouble with lost steps for most of the work Iām doing, but I am curious if servoās change the fundemental resolution of the commandable positions of the machine. My thought here is that at least some of the accuracy/resolution is because steppers can only lock on to 200 positions, and it looks like Clearpath servoās have 800 commandable positions in a rotation. That would seem to potentially lead to higher accuracy, but the backlash and nature of the rack/pinion interface might make that immaterial. Anyone have thoughts / experience here to share?
For most of my work this would not matter, but I do some small scale metal working where increased resolution and accuracy would be useful, and maybe that would be enough reason for me to spend the money to switch to servos.
Cheers,
Eric
This alone is going to give you a lot more performance and functionality.
Both our steppers and servos use the same mechanical system. If it were me Iād move away from the Nema 23s. Nema 34s on this new system perform great. Servos are even better. Theyāre faster, stronger, and closed loop.
All three systems have great positional accuracy (thanks to 2000 steps per rev X ~3 on steppers) and the high resolution of the servos. On servos we use ClearPaths hard stop homing to make homing even more accurate.
Honestly I think Nema 34s are very good value for money, but they are still open loop. If you can swing I often live by the āby once cry onceā motto. If you can swing it youāll never regret buying a servo system.